Were mobile phones hacked to spread rumour of Taliban leader's death?

Filed Under: Mobile, Vulnerability

Mullah OmarIt seems that the UK isn't the only country at the centre of a phone hacking scandal.

A spokesman for the Taliban has claimed that phones, email accounts and a website belonging to the group were hacked, and text messages distributed claiming that their reclusive Afghan leader Mullah Mohammed Omar had died from heart disease.

The original SMS text messages were received from phone numbers belonging to Taliban spokemen Zabihullah Mujahid and Qari Yousuf, and read:

"Spiritual Leader Mullah Mohammad Omar Mujahid has died. May Allah bless his soul."

Zabihullah Mujahid angrily denied the rumours that Mullah Omar, one of the world's most wanted men, was dead, in an interview with Reuters:

"This is the work of American intelligence, and we will take revenge on the telephone network providers."

Whether the mobile phones of Taliban spokespeople were actually hacked, or whether their phone numbers were spoofed when sending the messages, is unclear at this point in time. But it seems likely that the Taliban will be looking into how it can better secure its communications in future.

According to Zabihullah Mujahid, the United States has blocked access to the Taliban websites since July 14th. If the US forces were responsible for the rumours of Mullah Omar's death, in the hope of destabilising and confusing the Taliban, it certainly wouldn't be a surprise.

After all, disinformation and psychological warfare have been going on for hundreds of years.

Mullah Mohammed Omar has been in hiding since October 2001, with the USA offering a $10 million bounty for information leading to his capture.

So, if you see a one-eyed reclusive Taliban leader walking down your street, you now know who to contact.

, , , , ,

You might like

4 Responses to Were mobile phones hacked to spread rumour of Taliban leader's death?

  1. Bent · 1188 days ago

    universal hack war has started!

  2. jgr3n · 1187 days ago

    There have been numerous claims by those within and without the U.S. government that a cyberwar is not going on. If it isn't a full-fledged cyberwar, it is at least a cyber cold war.

  3. EViL_STeVe · 952 days ago

    It's a dog and pony show. Propaganda, public relations. Battle of perception.

    Who cares where information comes from if it is untrue.

    One word.

    Verification.

  4. Pilaf · 446 days ago

    Why is Russell Brand now a terrorist?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About the author

Graham Cluley runs his own award-winning computer security blog, and is a veteran of the anti-virus industry having worked for a number of security companies since the early 1990s. Now an independent security analyst, he regularly makes media appearances and gives computer security presentations. Send Graham an email, subscribe to his updates on Facebook, follow him on Twitter and App.net, and circle him on Google Plus for regular updates.