Were mobile phones hacked to spread rumour of Taliban leader's death?

Filed Under: Mobile, Vulnerability

Mullah OmarIt seems that the UK isn't the only country at the centre of a phone hacking scandal.

A spokesman for the Taliban has claimed that phones, email accounts and a website belonging to the group were hacked, and text messages distributed claiming that their reclusive Afghan leader Mullah Mohammed Omar had died from heart disease.

The original SMS text messages were received from phone numbers belonging to Taliban spokemen Zabihullah Mujahid and Qari Yousuf, and read:

"Spiritual Leader Mullah Mohammad Omar Mujahid has died. May Allah bless his soul."

Zabihullah Mujahid angrily denied the rumours that Mullah Omar, one of the world's most wanted men, was dead, in an interview with Reuters:

"This is the work of American intelligence, and we will take revenge on the telephone network providers."

Whether the mobile phones of Taliban spokespeople were actually hacked, or whether their phone numbers were spoofed when sending the messages, is unclear at this point in time. But it seems likely that the Taliban will be looking into how it can better secure its communications in future.

According to Zabihullah Mujahid, the United States has blocked access to the Taliban websites since July 14th. If the US forces were responsible for the rumours of Mullah Omar's death, in the hope of destabilising and confusing the Taliban, it certainly wouldn't be a surprise.

After all, disinformation and psychological warfare have been going on for hundreds of years.

Mullah Mohammed Omar has been in hiding since October 2001, with the USA offering a $10 million bounty for information leading to his capture.

So, if you see a one-eyed reclusive Taliban leader walking down your street, you now know who to contact.

, , , , ,

3 Responses to Were mobile phones hacked to spread rumour of Taliban leader's death?

  1. Bent says:

    universal hack war has started!

  2. jgr3n says:

    There have been numerous claims by those within and without the U.S. government that a cyberwar is not going on. If it isn't a full-fledged cyberwar, it is at least a cyber cold war.

  3. EViL_STeVe says:

    It's a dog and pony show. Propaganda, public relations. Battle of perception.

    Who cares where information comes from if it is untrue.

    One word.

    Verification.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <pre> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

About the author

Graham Cluley has worked in the computer security industry for more than 20 years, developing anti-virus software and doing quite a lot of talking about internet threats. He's won awards for his blogging, but is proudest of the text adventure games he wrote when he was still wearing short trousers. You can learn more about those (the games, not the trousers) at grahamcluley.com. Send Graham an email, subscribe to his updates on Facebook, follow him on Twitter and App.net, and circle him on Google Plus for regular updates.