US investigators will call for ban on Huawei, ZTE over spying concerns

Filed Under: Featured, Law & order, Privacy

Circuit board. Image from ShutterstockThe US House of Representatives Intelligence Committee will issue a report Monday that recommends that Chinese firms Huawei and ZTE should be barred from the US market because their products could be used to undermine domestic cyber security, according to a draft copy of the report obtained by Naked Security.

In a damning indictment of both companies, the House Intelligence Committee report accuses Huawei and ZTE executives of hindering its investigation of their business practices and hiding information.

Huawei may even be guilty of violating US trade laws, according to the report, which recommends that the US Government use its authority under the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS) to block acquisitions or mergers involving Huawei or ZTE.

In addition, the US Government and intelligence agencies should block any use of technology from the two firms. US businesses, the report recommends, should consider the "long term security risks" associated with doing business with either ZTE or Huawei, the report advises.

The report caps off a year-long official inquiry into the firms, which have been expanding their business in the United States, while maintaining close ties to the Chinese Communist Party and People’s Liberation Army at home.

The Committee sought to establish whether there was any factual claim to charges that the two firms posed a security risk to the USA by understanding how the companies functioned and their formal or informal ties to the Chinese government and Chinese Communist Party.

The investigation also looked into reported violations of US companies’ copyright and intellectual property rights.

China poster. Image from ShutterstockHuawei, based in the city of Shenzhen in Guangdong province, China, is the world’s largest maker of telecommunications equipment and employs 140,000 people world-wide.

The company is the world’s largest maker of telecommunications equipment and is a chief competitor to US-based firms like Cisco Systems, which has seen Huawei eat into its market share, especially in developing markets.

The two companies sparred over charges of copyright infringement and what Cisco alleges was the illegal use of Cisco code.

ZTE Corp., also based in Shenzhen, is the world’s fifth largest telecommunications equipment maker, and a major manufacturer of mobile phones, mobile telecommunications equipment and software.

The company found itself in hot water with United States regulators and business partners after Reuters reported that ZTE had helped funnel software and hardware from US firms including Oracle, Microsoft and Cisco Systems to the government of Iran in 2010 for use building what was described as a $130m, nation-wide surveillance system.

That act violated an American embargo on technology sales to the government of Iran and put ZTE’s US partners in hot water.

Ahead of the House Intelligence Committee report, one of those: Cisco Systems said it was breaking ties with ZTE, Reuters reported.

As part of the investigation, Committee members reviewed “open source” information and conducted interviews with company and government officials and held an open hearing with senior officials from both Huawei and ZTE.

Red circuit board. Image from ShutterstockDoes networking gear from Chinese firms Huawei and ZTE come with secret back doors accessible to the People’s Liberation Army?

The report’s authors admit that they found no “smoking gun” on that issue and lacked the technical expertise to pursue it seriously, anyway.

However, the Committee’s report notes that “companies around the United States” have experienced “odd or alerting incidents using Huawei or ZTE equipment.” The report also alluded to classified intelligence, not included in the public release, that is more damning.

That and the companies’ intransigence in the face of questions from the House Committee were enough to prompt the Committee to assume the worst about Huawei and ZTE’s practices – and recommend that American companies and government agencies do the same.

The United States government isn’t the first to ban equipment from the two telecom giants.

In May, 2010, India banned telecommunications firms there from importing Chinese networking equipment over fears that they were riddled with information-stealing spyware.

More recently, the federal government in Australia banned Huawei from participating in multi-billion dollar deals to supply equipment for a national broadband network, also over fears that the equipment could be used to aid cyber attacks by China’s government.


China poster, Circuit board and red circuit board images from Shutterstock.

, , , , , ,

You might like

9 Responses to US investigators will call for ban on Huawei, ZTE over spying concerns

  1. Rickn345 · 741 days ago

    Look what Huawei did to Nortel. One of the worlds largest communication companies hacked to bits.

  2. robert1234 · 741 days ago

    according to this logic, the Chinese government should ban Cisco, Juniper, IBM, HP, as these US based companies can also work for US government to still Chinese intelligence.

    • RobSuckMy · 152 days ago

      I don't think anyone is worried about the US government trying to "still" Chinese intelligence. Either you're a foreigner, or you're an idiot.

  3. Christo Alberts · 741 days ago

    Looks like James Bond Movie script.

  4. Robert Gracie · 740 days ago

    if you hide something from the US Government your gonna get your fingers burned its as simple as that you should be open not closed to US Government inspections if they think your hiding something they will not allow you in the country simple...

  5. Randy · 740 days ago

    "The report’s authors admit that they found no “smoking gun” on that issue and lacked the technical expertise to pursue it seriously, anyway"
    Lacked the technical expertise? That admission is even scarier than the article itself!

  6. Rod · 740 days ago

    Why are they writing this report at all if they lack the technical expertise??

  7. Bob · 735 days ago

    I believe most of the broadband DSLAM's in the UK are supplied by Huawei a deal agreed by a former minister.

  8. Rafael · 733 days ago

    The name of this is "Babysitter of Cisco" . They don't had proof, they lack of technical arguments, and some random incident in networks that had Huawei is a proof?!

    Poor Cisco, cannot be a good competitor and appeal to US Gov...

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About the author

Paul is a Boston-based reporter and industry analyst with more than a decade of experience covering the IT industry, cyber security and hacking. His work has appeared on threatpost.com, The Boston Globe, salon.com, NPR's Marketplace, Fortune Small Business, as well as industry publications including ZDNet, Computerworld, InfoWorld, eWeek, CIO , CSO and ITWorld.com. Paul got his 15 minutes as an expert guest on The Oprah Show - but that's a long story.