National security threat or not? Huawei offers Australia unrestricted access to code

Filed Under: Data loss, Featured, Law & order, Privacy, Security threats, Vulnerability

Huawei and AustraliaHuawei is offering unrestricted access to its code and hardware in an attempt to prove that it's not a security threat.

The Chinese telecom giant made the offer to Australia, which has blocked Huawei's bid to work on its national broadband network.

John Lord, chairman of Huawei's Australian arm, blamed the company's lousy communication for what he called "myths and misinformation" that have led to the company being shunned by multiple countries.

In a speech to Australia's National Press Club, he told the audience that Huawei must be more open, according to the BBC:

"Huawei has done a very poor job of communicating about ourselves and we must take full responsibility for that."

According to the BBC, Lord also said that Huawei will give the Australian authorities "complete and unrestricted access" to its software source code and equipment.

He also suggested that Australia set up a cyber evaluation centre to test communications network equipment, funded by telcos and operated by "security-cleared Australian nationals".

Lord said that such a centre has been established in the UK and that Huawei has already given British security agencies access to source code so they can check the security bona fides on its equipment.

He said that it shouldn't be up to a single vendor, country, agency or telco to solve computer security issues:

"It requires a collaborative approach by all to ensure we can create the most secure telecommunications environment possible."

Huawei also pitched the concept to US lawmakers during the Committee on Intelligence's investigation of the company.

The committee's report rejected the proposal on the grounds that Huawei's equipment is too complex, making it too difficult to assess whether the goods could be manipulated.

As it is, the US has already suggested that Huawei and another Chinese firm, ZTE, be banned from the US market because their products could be used to undermine domestic cyber security, given the potential for spying and espionage they could enable.

Circuit boardHuawei has a lot of people to convince.

India, for one. In 2010 the country banned telecoms from importing Chinese networking equipment, fearing that it's infested with spyware.

Then in March of this year, Australia banned Huawei from participating in multi-billion dollar deals to supply equipment for its national broadband network, given similar fears that the Chinese government could exploit the equipment to carry out cyber attacks.

The company's track record isn't helping to assure anybody.

Reuters on Thursday reported that an Iranian partner of Huawei last year offered to sell banned US antenna equipment to an Iranian mobile phone operator.

The would-be buyer told Reuters that it nixed the deal when it learned that the equipment was outlawed under US sanctions.

In spite of the deal falling through, the fact that Huawei tried it at all backs up the US's wariness about the company.

The US just isn't convinced that Huawei complies with international sanctions or US export laws, as the House Intelligence Committee charged in its report [PDF], which it issued earlier in October.

The documents and interviews Reuters relied on point to the almost-sale being an error on the part of the Iranian Huawei partner, rather than an intentional premeditated breach.

Whatever the truth of the matter, the facts point to Huawei being, in the very best case scenario, sloppy.


, , , , , , , , , ,

You might like

4 Responses to National security threat or not? Huawei offers Australia unrestricted access to code

  1. Andrew Symmons · 643 days ago

    IF IN DOUBT CHUCK IT OUT!!!

  2. Reg Meyer · 643 days ago

    Lord is openly bought and paid for now by Huawei which hardly makes him objective regarding the security of our country. Money moves many to make stupid choices and this looks like a sell out of principle for cold hard cash.

  3. raceviper13 · 643 days ago

    It wasn't the threat of Chinese backdoors that stopped the Australian's from using Huawei, it was the ridiculously poor security! Check out Risky.biz eposode #250 for details.

  4. Anonymous coward · 640 days ago

    Why all the fuss? I just moved to BT Infinity and found that BT supplies Huawei modems and a Huawei router as the Home Hub. The Hub exposes port 161 to allow BT and the call centers to manage the equipment and check out your LAN to aid in troubleshooting.

    Surely if BT consider that Huawei is trustworthy enough to secure their infrastructure (and that of their customers), the rest of the world shouldn't worry.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About the author

I've been writing about technology, careers, science and health since 1995. I rose to the lofty heights of Executive Editor for eWEEK, popped out with the 2008 crash, joined the freelancer economy, and am still writing for my beloved peeps at places like Sophos's Naked Security, CIO Mag, ComputerWorld, PC Mag, IT Expert Voice, Software Quality Connection, Time, and the US and British editions of HP's Input/Output. I respond to cash and spicy sites, so don't be shy.