Facebook users worldwide (minus some mobile phones) now getting secure web browsing by default

Filed Under: Facebook, Featured, Mobile, Security threats, Vulnerability, Web Browsers

Facebook initially introduced full-time HTTPS (secure HTTP) as an option in January 2011.

Before that, the site protected your password during login using HTTPS, but left the rest of your session unencrypted.

The change came about because, back in October 2010, a Firefox plugin called Firesheep was released as a proof of concept that sniffing an unencrypted session after login was all an attacker needed to hijack your account.

This made Facebook's new option welcome, but being opt-in meant it really didn't go far enough.

So, in an open letter in April 2011, Naked Security asked Facebook to improve privacy and safety by turning on HTTPS for everything.

In November 2012, Facebook finally did move to make secure browsing a default, at least for users in North America.

And on Wednesday, Facebook announced that it is now using HTTPS by default for all users, so the rest of the world has finally caught up. (Well, almost. Some mobile phones and carriers don't fully support HTTPS.)

Why did it take so long?

Because it involved a lot of moving parts, explains Facebook software engineer Scott Renfro.

Namely, it involved getting third-party application developers to upgrade, getting web-browser cookies to be compliant, controlling referrer headers, and migrating users to HTTPS without disrupting "in-flight" sessions, i.e. upgrading people while they're actually using the site.

Performance has also been a huge challenge, Renfro says, given the extra hoops browsers have to jump through with HTTPS:

In addition to the network round trips necessary for your browser to talk to Facebook servers, https adds additional round trips for the handshake to set up the connection. A full handshake requires two additional round trips, while an abbreviated handshake requires just one additional round trip. An abbreviated handshake can only follow a successful full handshake.

Here's an example from Renfro of how that extra latency can make users with already-slow connections suffer yet more, and how Facebook has eased the pain:

If you're in Vancouver, where a round trip to Facebook's Prineville, Oregon, data center takes 20ms, then the full handshake only adds about 40ms, which probably isn't noticeable. However, if you're in Jakarta, where a round trip takes 300ms, a full handshake can add 600ms. When combined with an already slow connection, this additional latency on every request could be very noticeable and frustrating. Thankfully, we've been able to avoid this extra latency in most cases by upgrading our infrastructure and using abbreviated handshakes.

Facebook's work on secure browsing is most certainly not done, mind you: the company says it's still working with mobile phone vendors to make it happen there.

Renfro calls HTTPS by default a "dream come true" — a goal that the company's network, security, traffic, and security infrastructure teams have been working on for years.

When Facebook first rolled out HTTPS by default, Naked Security was stuck with a heap of "Dislike" t-shirts that didn't seem appropriate anymore, so the team gave them away to readers.

Sorry, I don't know of any plans to print up "Like" t-shirts over the news that HTTPS by default is finally, for the most part, a dream come true.

But, Facebook engineers, here are two big, virtual thumbs-up for the work you've done. Let's hope it works out well for the mobile outliers, as well.

, , ,

You might like

3 Responses to Facebook users worldwide (minus some mobile phones) now getting secure web browsing by default

  1. daniellynet · 412 days ago

    This is why I use HTTPS everywhere.

    Some sites don't enable it by default, or heck, even hide the option for you!

    Also, Reddit doesn't advertise it publicly, but it has HTTPS too.

    I've heard that if a lot of people start using it they will disable it, though.

  2. Andrew · 408 days ago

    when Facebook sort out the mobile situation I may reconsider Facebook

  3. Pefferson Joont · 405 days ago

    "...Naked Security was stuck with a heap of "Dislike" t-shirts that didn't seem appropriate anymore, so the team gave them away to readers."

    How do I get mine?

    HTTPS by default is a step in the right direction, but it does little to mitigate the other abuses of privacy that Facebook actively encourages, not to mention their constant changing of the rules of engagement without adequate notification.

    Mr. Zuckerberg's contempt for Facebook users is no secret. Facebook's lip service to user protection isn't enough to mitigate the exploitation of its users' information in ways that benefit Facebook to the detriment of users.

    No...until they change their invasive, privacy-shredding policies, the "Dislike" condition is permanent, and the only rational course is to avoid Facebook altogether.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About the author

Follow Naked Security on Twitter at @NakedSecurity, on Facebook or join us on Google Plus.