Facebook pays out $20 million in personal ads settlement; each user gets $15

Filed Under: Facebook, Featured, Law & order

Facebook logo with dollar barsA US District Judge, Richard Seeborg, ruled on Monday that Facebook must pay out a total of $20 million over its Sponsored Stories adverts.

The settlement is the conclusion to a class action lawsuit brought over two years ago over the social networking giant's use of members' names and pictures without consent.

The total settlement amount will be divided between some of the affected users as well as attorneys and non-profit groups such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Berkman Centre for Internet and Society.

The case (Angel Fraley et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs. Facebook Inc) was originally brought before the courts in April 2011.

Five users accused Facebook of using their names and images to advertise products and services through the Sponsored Stories program, without them either opting in or receiving any kind of payment in return. Users have subsequently been able to opt out of appearing in such ads since June last year.

A Sponsored Story is an advertisement that appears on a user's Facebook page and typically includes a friend's name and profile picture along with a comment suggesting that they 'like' the advertiser in question.

In an official statement on the ruling, Judge Seeborg said:

Although the monetary relief to each class member is relatively small and the percentage of class members who submitted claims is limited, the settlement as a whole provides fair, reasonable, and adequate relief to the class, in light of all the circumstances, including the low probability that a substantially better result would be obtained through continued litigation.

The judge also highlighted how the plaintiffs "faced a substantial burden in showing they were injured by the Sponsored Stories" and that, "in attempting to quantify the value of the settlement’s injunctive relief, plaintiffs have repeatedly relied primarily on their argument that Facebook benefited, rather than that class members were harmed."

Under the terms of the settlement, Facebook will also have to change the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities which governs how user information can be used on the site.

The social giant will also be required to provide more information about similar programs in the future at an estimated cost of $145 million in advertising revenue, according to lawyers for the plaintiffs.

It's estimated that around 150 million Facebook users had their names and pictures used to promote Sponsored Stories, earning the company a profit of around $73m in total. However, only around 614,000 of those users are eligible to receive the compensatory amount of $15 set by the court - those who responded to an email from Facebook earlier this year.

Given how much Facebook makes from Sponsored Stories - $234 million between January 2011 and August 2012 - i wonder if a rapid restructuring of the program will be now be seen.

,

You might like

5 Responses to Facebook pays out $20 million in personal ads settlement; each user gets $15

  1. Suzanne · 359 days ago

    Huh - I'm not sure I remember receiving this email from FB, although I suppose I must have. Too late now, I guess. Proving 'harm' is definitely hard when it comes to ad sponsorship, which must be what FB's attorneys advised them when setting up these sponsored stories.

    What continues to irk me is that even though I opt out of seeing lots of things from my friends, I continue to see them. I'm trying to give them more privacy than FB is willing to allow. I totally get that it's a free service, and they've got to make money, and I can walk away; I've judged the inconveniences to be outweighed by the benefits. But still, it's annoying.

  2. Tammy · 359 days ago

    "Users have subsequently been able to opt out of appearing in such ads since June last year." Are users opted out by default, or per Facebook norm, do users have to dig through ten pages of security settings to find the "opt out" box?

  3. Nigel · 359 days ago

    The fact that Facebook is constantly changing the rules, coming up with new and more slimy methods of tricking users into doing things they've never opted into is the principal reason I ditched my account. If all their "features" were opt-in by default, I could be convinced that their intentions were honorable. But the fact that everything is opt-out by default speaks louder than their perfunctory lip service to their users' best interests. Facebook cares only about Facebook.

  4. Jack · 358 days ago

    Typical Class Action suit. The people that are burnt get nothing. The attorneys get the rewards. I wonder if I would even go along with one these days. You get headaches for a 10 dollar bill in return. What a joke the legal system has become.

    Jack

    • Thomas · 357 days ago

      Yeah! $15 to 614,000 equals $9,210,000. That's $10,790,000 for the attorneys and non- profit groups. Nothing against the non-profit groups, I don't know what their cut was but I hope it wasn't a pittance like the Facebook users got. I wonder what the trial cost and if Facebook had to pay court costs. Mr. Munson, do you have any details on that?

      And shame on Lee Munson and Naked Security for making me do the math.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About the author

Lee Munson is the founder of Security FAQs, a social media manager with BH Consulting and a blogger with a huge passion for information security.