Notably the Fix it was for 32-bit platforms only, so computers running 64-bit Windows versions, such as servers and almost any recent laptop, were out of luck.
That's a creditably quick response from Microsoft, and a great Tenth Birthday result.
By the way, there's a reliable and easy-to-modify proof of concept exploit floating around on the web, as well as an exploit module for the DIY break-and-enter toolkit Metasploit, so CVE-2013-3893 must be considered a clear and present danger.
If you don't have a decent anti-virus installed (or you have one that hasn't been updated since the free trial ran out a year ago) then you won't see anything - not a warning, a dialog box, a progress bar or even a logfile entry - to tell you what happened.
Your browser will eventually crash, but after the download has finished and the secretly installed malware has launched.
→ A decent anti-virus is ilkely to control this exploit. Sophos Anti-Virus, for example, blocks booby-trapped web pages as Exp/20133893-B. But immunising your browser alogether, by neutralising the vulnerability that makes the exploits possible in the first place, is by far the best solution.
There are nine other remotely exploitable holes fixed in the Internet Explorer patch, and although Microsoft describes the others as "privately reported," any one of them alone would be enough to make this patch a priority.
But don't concentrate only on the big fix for Internet Explorer.
There are six other bulletins that deal with remote code execution this month, and even though four of them are rated only at Important by Microsoft, rather than Critical, I'd still treat "important" as meaning "important enough to patch right away."
All the Important vulnerabilities are in various components of the Office suite, and can be triggered via shellcode - that's executable code buried invisibly in amongst data - in files you are entitled to assume that Office should open without risk.
In theory, if you put executable code in a data file, it ought to be harmless: whether you give your name as text that spells out Paul Ducklin or machine code that corresponds to PUSH-PUSH-CALL-POP should make no difference.
The machine code version of your name should be treated as data, and never get a chance to run.
Programming mistakes do happen, however, sometimes allowing deliberately mangled files to confuse Word or Excel (or other software of that sort) into executing data as if it were code.
The eighth patch this month is for an information disclosure bug in Silverlight.
Microsoft isn't saying what might be disclosed if this bug is triggered.
But since "information disclosure" is another way of saying "potential data breach," you probably want to patch the eighth one, too.
For the opinion of SophosLabs on the likelihood of each of the eight vulnerabilities being exploited, and for advice on alternative mitigiations (if you are unwilling to patch) or additional mitigations (if you are patching anyway), please visit our Vulnerabilties page.
Updates - how to check
Readers regularly ask us to remind them where to find the option to kick off a check for updates on Windows, so here's how.
On Windows 7, ① go to Control Panel | System and Security and, in the Windows Update entry, ② choose Check for updates:
On Windows 8, ① do a search for the word updates, ② click into the Settings section, and ③ choose Check for updates: