Massive FBI facial recognition database raises privacy fears

Filed Under: Featured, Law & order, Privacy

Facial recognition. Image courtesy of Shutterstock.The FBI is building a massive facial recognition database that could contain as many as 52 million images by 2015, according to information obtained by the EFF via a freedom of information request.

The agency's Next Generation Identification (NGI) system is an update to its existing fingerprint database - which itself contains over 100 million records - and has been in development for years.

In addition to photos, it also includes biometric data such as iris scans and palm prints.

In 2012 the NGI database contained 13.6 million images, covering somewhere between 7 and 8 million individuals. By the middle of last year that had grown to some 16 million images.

The new system will be capable of processing 55,000 direct photo enrolments daily and has the ability to conduct tens of thousands of searches every day. It is estimated that by 2015 the database will contain 52 million facial images.

The EFF cites its biggest concern as being the fact that the FBI anticipates having as many as 4.3 million images of non-criminals stored in the NGI database by next year.

Under the current system there is a clear separation between the records of criminals and non-criminals which are stored in separate databases.

But with the new system that distinction will be blurred - all records will now be stored on one database, irrespective of whether or not someone has been arrested for a crime.

In the past, the FBI has never linked the criminal and non-criminal fingerprint databases. This has meant that any search of the criminal print database (such as to identify a suspect or a latent print at a crime scene) would not touch the non-criminal database. This will also change with NGI. Now every record - whether criminal or non - will have a "Universal Control Number" (UCN), and every search will be run against all records in the database. This means that even if you have never been arrested for a crime, if your employer requires you to submit a photo as part of your background check, your face image could be searched - and you could be implicated as a criminal suspect - just by virtue of having that image in the non-criminal file.

Furthermore, non-criminals that previously applied for jobs where the employer asked for fingerprints may have seen them passed over to the old database. With NGI, employers will now take photos and pass them over too.

EFF also expressed concerns over the origins of some of the images.

By 2015, the FBI estimates that the NGI will include:

But the FBI doesn't define either the "Special Population Cognizant" or the "New Repositories" category.

This, the group says, is a problem as there is no way of determining what rules govern these categories, where the data comes from, how the images are gathered, who has access to them, and whose privacy is impacted.

Finally, EFF has concerns over NGI serving up questionable responses to search queries:

We know from researchers that the risk of false positives increases as the size of the dataset increases - and, at 52 million images, the FBI's face recognition is a very large dataset. This means that many people will be presented as suspects for crimes they didn’t commit. This is not how our system of justice was designed and should not be a system that Americans tacitly consent to move towards.


Image of face courtesy of Shutterstock.

, , ,

You might like

4 Responses to Massive FBI facial recognition database raises privacy fears

  1. What bothers me as a non-US person, is that this sort of data may be collected at border crossings without my knowledge. I consider this type of data to be an invasion of privacy.

  2. Andrew Ludgate · 192 days ago

    There's a further issue here -- the images in question are of extremely low quality for the most part, so potential for FP is relatively high. While the system that uses them is used to flag existing suspects (not to detect a suspect based solely on a facial match), it could easily flag the wrong person if they are already a suspect and happen to also be an FP in the list.

  3. Stop voting for Big Government. Vote for constitutionalists that want to down size the feds and shift the power to the states and the individual. If you want to vote for handouts and government power, you're going to have a bad day.

  4. Steve-o · 191 days ago

    What a waste of resources! A third of the income of most citizens goes to taxes and this is what they do with it? The diminishing returns frustrate me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About the author

Lee Munson is the founder of Security FAQs, a social media manager with BH Consulting and a blogger with a huge passion for information security.