Is the art of computer viruses dead?

Filed Under: Featured, Malware

Bratsa BonifachoStop press! The art of computer viruses may not be dead, after all.

Vancouver-based artist Bratsa Bonifacho says his latest collection of paintings has been inspired by computer malware.

One of Bonifacho's virus paintings is titled "Horty MyParty is Weird and Coolnow".

An unusual name, you might think, but it is apparently inspired by a number of viruses from yesteryear including VBS/Horty (which claimed to offer pornographic content of adult film star Jenna Jameson), 2002's MyParty email worm, and the CoolNow MSN Messenger worm.

Horty MyParty is Weird and Coolnow

In the words of the artist, his work..

"..explores the tensions between the logical, linear scripting of virus programs and their capacity for destruction. In the simplest terms, he imitates the effects of computer viruses and worms by scrambling letters and messages in his large-scale oil paintings. His work carries the elegance of programming code. It also indicates the deep layers of chaos and confusion caused by viruses."

Golly. What a chance I missed entering the field of computer security rather than art criticism. A layman like me wouldn't have understood that Bonifacho "communicates and expresses essentially non-verbal thoughts and emotions abstractly, within the discipline of formalism - through colour and shape, gesture and surface.." unless I had visited his website.

Today most malware isn't written to impress the virus writer's peers by spreading digital graffiti, but instead to stealthily steal information. As a result, the art we used to see from malware has pretty much disappeared.

Unlike the old days, most modern malware authors don't like their creations to draw attention to themselves by plotting Mandelbrot fractals on the screen (as the Tequila virus did) or swirling spiraling whirlpools (W32/Hybris) or give the opportunity to throw coconuts at members of the computer security community.

Collage of old visual viruses

It's not just a visual art either.

In "the old days" some malware authors would sometimes spend months takibg care, honing their creation so that no anti-virus products would detect it, whereas today we see the result of mass-produced malware created on a conveyor belt.

Today's cybercriminal, in the main, doesn't care if some anti-virus products detect his or her code. After all, if this particular variant of the malware doesn't successfully infect computers there'll be another one along in a couple of minutes.

It's always been a bad thing and indefensible to spread malware irresponsibly and infect innocent people's computers, but there was some pride shown by (at least some of) their creators in the past in what they had written.

The old-school malware writers probably got a kick out of thinking that anti-virus companies were burning the midnight oil, attempting to find a way to make their anti-virus software detect infections reliably.

And although we in the anti-virus industry never appreciated their efforts, we could grudgingly concede that some of the cybercriminals had programming talent - albeit misdirected.

So, I think you could potentially argue that there was an art involved in virus-writing.

In the present day, however, we have to acknowledge that any pretence of "art" has been subsumed by mass-produced malware of typically poor quality.

Despite the efforts of painters such as Bratsa Bonifacho, the art of computer viruses is largely dead.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not shedding a tear for its loss. I just hope that one day it might be joined in its computer coffin with the insidious mass-produced data-stealing malware that many people are impacted by today.

, ,

You might like

13 Responses to Is the art of computer viruses dead?

  1. fallenangel5000 · 1295 days ago

    This is actually a thought provoking idea. Art is so subjective in it's existence that often it is difficult to decide whether it is art(istic) or not. Comparing the viruses of yesteryear with those of today does show us there was a level of artistic intent present then that is lacking now. Not that I'm shedding any tears for their disappearance either...

  2. alanthehat · 1295 days ago

    I always wanted to catch the one that tumbles (DOS mode) text down your screen - the description sounds pretty & I was using a floppy-only setup, so it wouldn't really hurt much

  3. "gunner" · 1294 days ago

    my "artistic appreciation" goes to the guys and girls who work to beat the virus writers and keep my computer clean and working for me. thanks, and i'll try to do my part by staying alert, and being cautious on the web.

    • Hear hear! I would agree with you that the ones who fight the malware, rather than write it, are the ones who deserve our admiration.

  4. Dan · 1294 days ago

    I think in many ways this isn't so much the death of the art of writing a virus as the widespread death of the art of coding in general. As programming has become more and more commercialized, a lot of originality in general has disappeared. It has become more about getting a piece of code out the door quickly and less about taking the time to refine it into something truly great.

  5. Robert Wurzburg · 1294 days ago

    I'd like to see malware writers get patents and copyrights on their works, then they
    have to submit all their code to the U.S. Patent Office. How easy it would be then to
    take stock of their creations and write code to protect us against theirs!

    • Machin Shin · 1294 days ago

      Now that is a grand idea! Patent malware! Then you can sue anyone who dares infringe on your patent. That is of course if you can find them.

  6. "In the present day, however, we have to acknowledge that any pretence of "art" has been subsumed by mass-produced malware of typically poor quality."

    Really? from what I've seen TLD4 is as good as anything from the time of the Black Baron, tight, cleaver and bug free.

  7. Greenaum · 68 days ago

    See, art is much easier than coding. Talk the kind of rubbish that's currently in fashion, and you can sell your breakfast as a masterpiece.

    What annoys me is they all talk the same kind of rubbish. It's always asking questions about, exploring limits, or juxtaposing something. None of it ever claims to have any sort of meaning, because that might put someone else, who sees a different meaning, off reviewing / curating / buying it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About the author

Graham Cluley runs his own award-winning computer security blog at, and is a veteran of the anti-virus industry having worked for a number of security companies since the early 1990s. Now an independent security analyst, he regularly makes media appearances and gives computer security presentations. Follow him on Twitter at @gcluley