Ridiculously redacted interpretation of FISA snooping law released

Filed Under: Law & order, Privacy

The Electronic Frontier Foundation managed to pry a secret document out of the US government that describes how authorities should interpret the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act (FAA).

But a fat lot of good that does, given that a) they weren't the actual documents the EFF requested and b) they were redacted into a ridiculously useless pile of dashes.

Redacted document

The EFF received the redacted blobs a few days after Congress reauthorized FISA for another five years, at the end of December.

The documents were sent in response to the EFF's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit for secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) opinions that found the government's FAA surveillance unconstitutional.

As the EFF pointed out, referring to previous Wired coverage, FISA is the law used to conduct what many construe as unconstitutional surveillance of US citizens.

The New York Times has reported that intelligence officials and lawyers describe the National Security Agency (NSA) as engaging in significant, systemic "overcollection" of domestic communications of Americans.

Pre-reauthorization, Senator Jeff Merkley had sponsored an amendment, with bipartisan support, that would have given slightly more insight into the FAA and how the government interprets the law—interpretations that now take place in secret courts.

Here's how the EFF described Merkley's modest amendment:

The amendment was a measured nudge towards greater transparency: it would have required the government to either declassify Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) opinions, or provide unclassified summaries of those opinions; or, even failing that, just give a progress report on the status of trying to declassify FISC opinions.

Despite the efforts of outspoken advocates for FAA reform, including Senators Merkley, Wyden, Udall, and Paul, the Senate voted down the Merkley Amendment, 54-37.

Redacted documentThe EFF has posted the government's full response to its FOIA lawsuit [PDF].

The documents, in fact, aren't the actual FISC opinions that the EFF had requested. Rather, they were summaries of those opinions, which are provided to Congressional intelligence committees in order to give them guidance in spying on citizens.

Even the opinion summaries the government did provide are likely most useful as scrap paper for grocery lists, given their mostly blank, white pages.

Zack Whittaker at ZDNet was kind enough to transcribe the only legible bits of text from the documents, which I likewise reproduce here:

(U) The Government has provided copies of the opinions and the filings by the Government to this Committee, and the Government will continue to inform the Committee about developments in this matter.

I'm sure the Government will continue to inform the Committee about developments in this matter, and I'm sure we'll continue to garner more blank, white scrap paper from such efforts.

Thank you, minority group of Senators, for your efforts to attain even a modicum of transparency into the laws used, presumably, unconstitutionally against US citizens.

As for the rest of you Senators, thanks for nothing whatsoever.

, , , , , ,

You might like

4 Responses to Ridiculously redacted interpretation of FISA snooping law released

  1. Joe Dirt · 993 days ago

    Encrypt everything.

  2. Hiromi · 993 days ago

    It's actually called the Foreign Intelligence *Surveillance* Act.

  3. burvan · 993 days ago

    shame you could not get the info from GCHQ as they, i'm sure, already have a copy of the report

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About the author

I've been writing about technology, careers, science and health since 1995. I rose to the lofty heights of Executive Editor for eWEEK, popped out with the 2008 crash, joined the freelancer economy, and am still writing for my beloved peeps at places like Sophos's Naked Security, CIO Mag, ComputerWorld, PC Mag, IT Expert Voice, Software Quality Connection, Time, and the US and British editions of HP's Input/Output. I respond to cash and spicy sites, so don't be shy.