Bizarre Google search bug benefits porn websites

Filed Under: Featured, Google

Once upon a time in January, a Quora user asked,

What does -4^(1/4)" mean and why is it connected to porn?

Certainly, as of Tuesday morning, a Google search on the equation was still returning (in addition to the equation's solution) sites with very XXX titles, top results including "Sleazy Riders Rachel Starr" and "Four Guys And A Hooker".

(By the way, you should first note that any strings mentioned in this post are Not Safe For Work, and even if you're at home, you should close your browser window before it burns a hole through your monitor.)


An anonymous Quora user noted that the equation can be translated into a contradictory search string, in that it translates into something along the lines of:

"Find me pages … containing a 1 next to a 4, but which do not contain a 4."

Anon also noted that the bug is triggered by other (but not all) contradictory search strings, such as

"1 2" -1

"1 2" -2

Porn search results

Jeremy Hoffman, a Google software engineer who works on search quality, chimed in, explaining that these types of contradictory searches should return zero results, since it's impossible to satisfy both requirements, but there seems to be a bug that causes some very interesting pages to "match" both contradictory sides of the queries.

His explanation:

As a web search query, [-4^(1/4)] is interpreted like [-4 "1 4"], as in "Find me pages which contain a 1 next to a 4, but which do not contain a 4." This should return zero results, because it is impossible to satisfy both requirements. However, we have uncovered a bug that causes some web pages to "match" these contradictory queries. Since these are the only results that "match" the query, they are the results that get shown.

NBC News's Devin Coldewey broke it down further, interpreting the bug as being caused by Google calculating the numerical query as it should, but also running it as a normal text search, "just in case".

The text version of the search then turns the equation's parentheses into quote marks, and the negative sign is used to exclude unwanted words from results, Coldewey says.

Another Quora user, J.C. Hewitt, pointed out that the porn sites are likely benefiting from the glitch by using anchor text containing the contradictory queries, given that such sites are "super-SEO'd," he says:

It's likely that the linking pages use anchor text that contains that query. This is just my guess and how I would achieve this effect if I were a bad guy.

Since a lot of porn terms are competitive, my bet is that they're driving up certain sites using obscure terms that no one will use to build the page rank of their video sites, which then pass their link authority to the real sites that they're trying to boost.

People aren't likely to find and report your gibberish link farm if only robots ever see it. You then use the sites that have a high authority and rank for nonsense terms to built the authority of the stuff that you're really trying to promote.

Google is working on a fix, Hoffman wrote. Google declined to comment to the news outlets that asked how that's coming along.

Porn image from Shutterstock.

, , ,

You might like

3 Responses to Bizarre Google search bug benefits porn websites

  1. Ken Harthun · 965 days ago

    As of right now, this appears to be fixed.

  2. Michael · 965 days ago

    I could see searching for some error message from an event log entry that would return something I wouldn't like hitting my browser. Great, now I have to vet my search before I run it. Hopefully my Sophos Web Appliance is a little more forgiving about my searches and doesn't send my boss hate mail alerts about my search habits.
    *** Joking, on both accounts (vetting and the Sophos alerting).

  3. John · 965 days ago

    -4^(1/4) without the final " is equal to -√2 in some computer notations. Perhaps the English pronunciation of this result appeals to the porn site owners.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About the author

I've been writing about technology, careers, science and health since 1995. I rose to the lofty heights of Executive Editor for eWEEK, popped out with the 2008 crash, joined the freelancer economy, and am still writing for my beloved peeps at places like Sophos's Naked Security, CIO Mag, ComputerWorld, PC Mag, IT Expert Voice, Software Quality Connection, Time, and the US and British editions of HP's Input/Output. I respond to cash and spicy sites, so don't be shy.