Two incidences of non-consensual porn have hit Australian headlines recently, along with sneers and jibes at police and the women whose photos were stolen or shared without their approval.
Some of the victims are possibly underaged girls.
700 images of women from “Brisbane and surrounding areas” were reportedly uploaded to an online forum on Friday, with a link to a New Zealand-based file-sharing service.
The photos were taken down on Monday morning, came back on Monday night, and came back down on Tuesday after the service complied with a police request to yank them.
As it is, police say they can’t investigate whomever uploaded the photos without having received a complaint from a victim, but nobody had come forward as of news reports published on Wednesday.
The photo uploader taunted the police:
Come at me aussie police.
… and told them that he would simply re-upload the images in the Deep Web – the part of the World Wide Web that’s not indexed by search engines like Google and Bing, and requires access through an anonymity-based service such as Tor.
Without a formal complaint, police are doing what they can.
The Brisbane Times quoted Fraud and Cyber Crime Group Detective Superintendent Brian Hay:
The thing is, we don't have a complaint and the focus has to be on harm minimisation to try and get these things down so people's lives aren't ruined.
We certainly don't want to be directing people to these sites.
When you've got a complaint then you've got an offence.
You do get images that may be posted voluntarily but to post an image may or may not be an offence.
The uploading of this photo set comes on the heels of the posting of images of 500 nude, risqué and revealing images of Adelaide women and teens to a US forum without their permission.
According to Daily Mail Australia, the forum’s users told victims that “you cannot do anything to stop us.”
According to Yahoo 7 News, the victims of the Adelaide photo thefts claim that the images were stolen from private social media accounts or that vengeful partners shared them as revenge porn.
The victims first became aware of the images being publicly posted and shared through Facebook and other social media.
The photo collection reportedly first came into being when a user requested photo trades on a forum thread.
Less than a month after he put out the call, the user boasted that he had 500 images and was looking for more.
His reported humblebrag:
It's really been me doing 90 per cent of the work collecting new content, organising folders, killing duplicates, merging archives.
This has been my latest project ... I didn't take all the pics myself or anything but I did go through every single thread and save nearly every image myself.
Detective Sergeant Barry Blundell told Daily Mail Australia that South Australian Police were working with the Australian Communications and Media Authority to have the New Zealand website that posted the images shut down.
If any of the images turn out to be of girls under the age of 16, they’ll be considered child porn, and the offenders could potentially be jailed up to 10 years or wind up on the sex offenders registry.
Police are encouraging anyone who thinks their explicit photos have been posted without their permission to report it via the Australian Cybercrime Online Reporting Network.
Image of keyboard courtesy of Shutterstock.
10 comments on “Hundreds of Australian nude images posted without women’s consent”
Eventually people will learn their lesson and stop posting nude pictures of themselves on the internet.
Victim blaming is completely unacceptable!
I just cannot understand some people !
Is this real or is it just intox to bait audience with a hot topic ? Because from what I read there’s almost no geniune information that give me the feeling that it actually happened. Does this uploader have a nickname ? were did it post the “Come at me aussie police” message ? did it tweet this ? what are the sources of your source ?
I’m guessing Naked Security left out details because they don’t want to encourage people to look for these images. That seems like a good decision.
Nobody, including the police, is publishing the places where these images or the messages were posted, for good reason. We don’t want to encourage people to look for the images and thereby continue the victimization of these women.
Don’t take nude pics and you have no fear of them ending up on the net.
Yawn, let me guess – they’re trying to get ACMA to shut down mega again?
The problem with just saying “so don’t take nude pictures” is that the same could be said of any risky activity: “Don’t want to get into a car accident? Don’t drive. Walk to work . It’s good exercise.” It’s perfectly reasonable advice which will be followed by exactly *nobody*, since it utterly fails to consider the fact that some people actually *want* to do these things despite the risks for whatever reason. The discussion should focus on what can be done to minimise the risks and what recourse people have when things go wrong; saying “don’t do that” achieves nothing except perhaps to make the speaker feel better about themselves.
Well said. And here’s Bennett Haselton’s great essay about the faulty logic behind both victim blaming and our typical responses to victim blaming: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/10/13/1411252/the-correct-response-to-photo-hack-victim-blamers