DCLeaks, the same site that leaked Colin Powell’s embarrassing emails, has published what are purportedly personal emails from a White House staffer, including a scan of, allegedly, Michelle Obama’s passport.
First things first: Is it real?
Twitter users are pointing out that the purported passport is only good for 5 years, whereas most adult passports in the US are good for 10. I’ll update the story once I ascertain that.
That doesn’t make it fake. Government employee passports are reportedly only good for 5 years.
The emails appear to be those of a staffer whose LinkedIn profile lists his job title as Advance Associate at the White House. He’s worked there since April 2015 and also appears to work for the Clinton campaign as an event organizer.
The emails, sent between February 2015 and July 2016, were apparently taken from the staffer’s personal Gmail account.
A Secret Service spokeswoman told Politico that the agency was “aware of the alleged email hacking of a White House employee” but declined to say whether it’s investigating.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch told reporters that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is “aware of those media reports” and is looking into the matter.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest declined to discuss the leak at his daily briefing but said that officials are looking at the information that’s been disclosed.
Obviously we take any reports about a cyber breach seriously, particularly if it may include some sensitive information.
The staffer’s personal email was posted Tuesday by DC Leaks, and the passport image went up on Wednesday.
As well as Colin Powell’s intimate emails, DCLeaks has also previously posted pilfered emails allegedly coming from other Clinton campaign workers and some Republican lawmakers who’ve criticized the Russian regime, including Sens. John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Michele Bachmann.
3 comments on “Michelle Obama’s passport – or a scan that looks like it – posted online”
I don’t get it……a passport…..maybe……how is this news?
Interested to know exactly how a site leaking information for political figures who happen to be democrats and less right-wing republicans becomes state-sponsored hacking.
Its at best a deductive leap with little to no real evidence, at least as far as your story can show, at worst, a dangerous example that could be used against whoever is responsible to massively upgrade any punishments they might recieve…
Who called this breach state-sponsored? I see nothing about that in this article. Breaking into a White House staffer’s email is definitely a cyber security issue and is worthy of mention, regardless of the party affiliation of the current resident of that building.