The Tor Project has long offered high-security alternatives for folk who are especially concerned about their privacy. But as the world goes mobile, and is increasingly accessed through smartphones, users become vulnerable to a whole new set of compromises.
That’s where the Tor Phone prototype comes in – and it’s just been significantly improved.
According to developer Mike Perry, Tor Phone aims:
…to demonstrate that it is possible to build a phone that respects user choice and freedom, vastly reduces vulnerability surface, and sets a direction for the ecosystem with respect to how to meet the needs of high-security users.
It’s also “meant to show that it is still possible to replace and modify your mobile phone’s operating system while retaining verified boot security – though only just barely”.
Tor Phone starts with Copperhead OS, an open-source Android fork focused on security. As Perry writes:
Copperhead is also the only Android ROM that supports Verified Boot, which prevents exploits from modifying the boot, system, recovery, and vendor device partitions…
Copperhead has also extended this protection by preventing system applications from being overridden by Google Play Store apps, or from writing bytecode to writable partitions (where it could be modified and infected).
Therein lies a huge obstacle to Tor Phone deployment, however.
Together with Copperhead, Tor Phone installs the Orbot Tor proxy app, OrWall firewall, F-Droid alternative app repository, additional tools, and finally, Google Play (primarily, Perry says, so you can retrieve the Signal app for encrypted voice calling and instant messaging).
Its components must install to the system partition. Therefore, says Perry:
We must re-sign the Copperhead image and updates… to [maintain] system integrity from Verified Boot.
Unfortunately, only selected Google Nexus/Pixel devices let users control this with their own keys, while still supporting Verified Boot. So you can’t do this with your own cheap-o Android device, no matter how strong your Linux and related skills are – what’s more, a quick look at the directions confirms that setting up Tor Phone is non-trivial.
You can jumpstart the process by purchasing a smartphone with Copperhead pre-installed – for the moment, of course, while supplies last. And, with the right hardware, says Perry, Tor Phone works: notwithstanding some “rough edges,” he relies on his right now.
Why bother with all this? Perry and Tor argue that Google is increasingly moving to lock down the Android platform, claiming it’s the only way to overcome Android’s “fragmentation and resulting insecurity”.
Tor argues instead for a strategy based on transparency:
[As] more components and apps are moved to closed source versions, Google [reduces] its ability to resist the demand that backdoors be introduced.
Those might come from nefarious governments, of course. But, in Ars Technica, Perry notes that untraceable backdoors might also be introduced by hackers purely interested in financial gain. This is less likely, he argues, if a mobile OS remains fully open…
We are concerned that the freedom of users to use, study, share, and improve the operating system software on their phones is being threatened. If we lose these freedoms on mobile, we may never get them back.
For Tor Phone to gain traction, it’ll probably need to run on more than a couple of high-end devices manufactured by Google itself. In Ars Technica, Perry stresses that Tor won’t enter the secure hardware business.
But someone could, he says, citing the crowdfunded Neo900 project as a model:
What I’ve found is that posts like [his Tor Phone update] energise the Android hobbyist/free software ecosystem, and make us aware of each other and common purpose.
If you’re thinking “sounds like there’s a long way to go,” Perry might agree. He named his current prototype “Mission Improbable”. But that’s big progress: he named the previous prototype “Mission Impossible”.
6 comments on “The Tor Phone prototype: a truly private smartphone?”
Anyone know if the baseband is custom or not? How does it handle IMSI catchers? As for the Google Play / Signal trade off, why not get rid of Google Play and use Telegram in FDroid? Would love to see a full blown TAILS version – Ubuntu phones?
Telegram isn’t nearly secure as Signal is. On the other hand, they could get rid off GPlay using LibreSignal with Web Sockets form Fdroid, which doesn’t require Google Cloud services.
I’m a happy CopperheadOS user, but it’s true that not having GPlay makes some things complicated. I’ve a secondary phone just to download and trasfer apps that aren’t available on Fdroid
I thought Moxie stopped the Libre Signal guys from putting their app on Fdroid. You can compile Signal yourself but the first thing it does is inform you that it needs Google play.
Is this any relation to the new (relatively) Blackberry android Phone?
And privatOS and blackphone, why not ?