Last week we reported how Syrian refugee Anas Modamani challenged Facebook on whether the company had the technical capability to put a halt to fake news. It was after his selfie with German chancellor Angela Merkel went viral and began to appear alongside statements claiming he was a “terror suspect”. The story pointed to technology to help social media tackle online abuse.
As fake news – particularly around refugees – continues to shake German politics, can we really just point the finger at Facebook?
Fake news on the rise
Drawing comparisons between the more sedate German election campaign and Trump’s rise to power in the US, the Financial Times reports that there are fears that
the German election debate will be hijacked by news peddlers, conspiracy theorists, racist ideologues, trolls and cyber-bullies
And Deutsche Welle reported recently that “Angela Merkel is being attacked in fake news spread by right-wing extremists”.
But Germany isn’t the only European country where elections are being held this year – ballots are also imminent in France and the Netherlands. French presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron’s party chief has claimed,according to Deutsche Welle, that the French democratic process is also a target:
Two big media outlets belonging to the Russian state, Russia Today and Sputnik, spread fake news on a daily basis, and then they are picked up, quoted and influence the democratic [process]
Who’s doing what?
With the problem real and threatening to influence democracies around the world, what is being done to combat not only the spread of fake news but also the release of hacked emails?
The Telegraph reports that officials in France, Germany and the Netherlands have agreed to share information in the run-up to their respective elections this year.
It’s a start, but is it enough? Across Europe:
- The European Commission, according to Media File, is committing more staff resources to its anti-disinformation task force under an initiative known as the East Stratcom Task Force.
- Germany, Deutsche Welle reports, is looking to setting up a centre to fight disinformation – and had urged political parties to not use social bots and fake news during campaigning.
- In France, 17 newsrooms are teaming up with Facebook and Google to fact-checking service called the CrossCheck project to tackle the rise of fake news, according to the BBC earlier this month. It’s not live yet, but should be up and running by February 27, The Disinformation Review reports.
- As far as the Netherlands is concerned, there’s no clear news on any initiatives to combat fake news specifically, but there are reports – this one in The Guardian – that votes are going to be counted manually to counteract any threat from hackers.
What you can do
So, that’s a brief summary of what the powers that be, political parties and the media are doing. But is there anything you can do personally?
Talking to Deutsche Welle, defense analyst and professional fake news hunter Ben Nimmo explains that part of the problem lies in the money that there is to be made from advertising:
… countless fake news stories are going around because money can be earned from advertising on the websites that publish the false stories.
He suggests you only need time and a familiarity with social media outlets and how they work together, rather than an understanding of technology, to hunt them out – and that’s something we all can do.
And the complex ones? While he does acknowledge that experts are needed so solve some cases, he also suggests that citizens must be taught how to uncover fake news. I agree. After all, the more of us that get involved, the better the detection rate and lower the effect.
If there’s one thing you take away from reading this, it should be his advice to us all. Noting that “The key is emotion”, he urges:
If a story appeals to your feelings, be they anger or rejection, and not your thoughts, then you have to check it.
7 comments on “Fake news: what can we all do to play our part in combating it?”
Seems to me that internet anonymity emboldens some people to post false information online. Organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Mozilla, et al are very vocal in defending civil liberties in the digital world. In fact, the EFF says it, “… champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation … ” and goes on to say, “… EFF uses the unique expertise of leading technologists, activists, and attorneys in our efforts to defend free speech online, fight illegal surveillance, advocate for users and innovators, and support freedom-enhancing technologies.”
It’s a slippery slope. What offends one person may be nothing more than another person’s free expression.
How about establishing a website,call it Veracity,with know honest people whos job it is to research stories and publish finding.
Paid for by the public purse but by law, established to be unanswerable to the government of the day.
There is a mobile app called Veracity for doing reverse image searches. [link removed]
We need to make sure we don’t overlook historical examples. Fake News is not a new phenomenon, or an internet phenomenon, Shakespeare wrote about it in Julius Caesar for crying out loud.
Sounds like we need a ministry of truth, oh wait bad idea!
‘Fake news’ presumes ‘real news’. This is a mistaken assumption. All ‘news’ is neither ‘fake’ or ‘real’. Instead it is always a subjective and imperfect human offering, given that all humans are subjective and, therefore, always less than perfect or complete in what they do, say or write. The ‘media’, in any and all of its forms, is clearly no exception to this reality.
There is only one action that will protect all of us from all ‘news’, and that is to not believe or trust any of it from anyone or anything, anywhere. Instead we should test it continually in order to establish the agenda(s) of the originator. Simples. Anyone can do this. Everyone should. Problem solved. Instantly.
Not forgetting of course, mainstream ‘news’ outlets who have a hidden agenda and just lie to their audience on a daily basis. It’s legal to do that in the US (unless you’re being accused of being a ‘conspiracy theorist’ of course)