As if the US newspaper industry doesn’t have enough to contend with, on the morning of 29 December one of its largest publishing groups, Tribune Media, found itself battling a major ransomware attack.
This caused big problems for many newspapers in its stable including the Chicago Tribune and New York Daily News, as well as the Los Angeles Times and San Diego Union-Tribune, sold last year but share Tribune Media’s publishing platform.
The disruption varied from title to title, but in most cases, Saturday’s delivery was delayed for up to 24 hours while others were printed without regular sections.
Even The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, which were not directly affected but share an LA printing press for some editions, were disrupted.
But who was to blame?
A report in the Los Angeles Times said an informed source had identified a “foreign entity,” before going on to mention an important detail:
One company insider, who was not authorized to comment publicly, said the corrupted Tribune Publishing computer files contained the extension “.ryk,” which is believed to be a signature of a “Ryuk” attack.
As our recent article on the topic noted, Ryuk has been connected to North Korea on the basis of some similarities (such as the encryption used) between it and another ransomware called Hermes, which some people attribute to North Korea’s Lazarus Group.
So, taken at face value, there is a loose connection to North Korea. Attributing the attacks to a state actor makes the attack geopolitical, which makes for more interesting commentary and exciting headlines. And perhaps it makes it easier for the victim to explain how an intruder found themselves in a position to run ransomware on their network too.
But security companies are unenthusiastic about this sort of finger-pointing, and Sophos is no exception. Even in cases where there’s a lot more information on which to base a judgement, attribution is extremely difficult.
Beyond the fact that we have little evidence of anything (the company hasn’t even mentioned receiving a ransom note), all attackers have an incentive to make it look like somebody else is behind their work, and ransomware groups have a history of copying one another’s code and tactics.
For example, one of the ways that Ryuk finds it’s way on to a victim’s network is via weak RDP (Remote Desktop Protocol) credentials, a method common to almost all targeted ransomware.
From there, targeted ransomware attackers will typically try to make themselves a domain administrator, which gives them tremendous power, allowing them to attack security software and deploy and run their malware to best effect.
The tenuous nature of attribution, and the similarity between targeted ransomware attacks, arguably makes the focus on exactly which bit of malware was used in the culmination of the attack a bit of a red herring. If an organisation is vulnerable to one kind of targeted ransomware group, it’s probably vulnerable to more than one, and you’re going to read about whichever attacker found the victim first.
The silver lining in all this grim uniformity is that a similar set of defensive tactics works for all kinds of targeted ransomware attacks. You can read more about those in our article on How to defend yourself against SamSam ransomware.
With SamSam, the US Government pursued the attackers quietly before apparently deciding to use the naming of suspects as a deterrent against future attacks.
Whomever was behind the attack on Tribune Media was obviously undeterred.
3 comments on “US newspapers battle ransomware”
Hmmm… Payback for “fake News”?
I’m waiting for the other media shoes to drop – this could get very interesting…
Please explain this comment “perhaps it makes it easier for the victim to explain how an intruder found themselves in a position to run ransomware on their network too” This comment seems to come out of left field. How is a ransomware attack created by a state actor easier to explain than any other ransomware attack?
Please explain this comment in the above article: “For example, one of the ways that Ryuk finds it’s way on to a victim’s network is via weak RDP (Remote Desktop Protocol) credentials, a method common to almost all targeted ransomware.”
Where are you getting this information? The Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) can be used to gain access to a network, but this is very rare. Attacks use a variety of methods, the most common way ransomware enters a network is through one of three methods: Exploit kits this usually happens when a victim visits a compromised website, Malicious email attachments, and third, Malicious email links. Source: [URL removed]. I can easily site more sources if you need.
RDP is widely used, and widely abused, see:
Targeted ransomware is deployed by hackers who abuse RDP (or other internet-facing vulnerabilities).
SamSam is the canonical example of targeted ransomware:
Ryuk is typically used in targeted ransomware attacks:
The comment is about targeted ransomware, like Ryuk, which doesn’t come in file attachments or drive-bys. It’s typically deployed and run by hackers who have already succeeded in making themselves domain admins in a victim’s network.