You would be forgiven for thinking that encrypting PDFs, before they are stored or sent via email, keeps their contents away from prying eyes.
But according to researchers in Germany, it might be time to revisit that assumption after they discovered weaknesses in PDF encryption which could be exploited to reveal the contents of a file to an attacker.
Dubbed ‘PDFex’ (PDF exfiltration), the weaknesses documented in Practical Decryption exFiltration: Breaking PDF Encryption by researchers from Ruhr University Bochum and the Münster University of Applied Sciences, offer two attack methods, each with three variants that depend on which PDF viewer is used to open a target document.
Attack #1 – direct exfiltration
The PDF standard ships with native AES symmetric encryption which secures documents using a password communicated to the recipient (arguably a weakness in itself) or, in some installations, through public key encryption.
However, the researchers quickly discovered a hole in this method, so glaringly obvious that it’s surprising nobody’s noticed it before. The PDF standard allows for partially encrypted documents that include a mix of both encrypted and unencrypted sections, and does not include integrity checking. This means an attacker can add additional sections or interactive Actions to an encrypted PDF without raising any alarms, said the researchers in their overview:
Actions can be set to run when a document is opened or something within the document is clicked on, and send the decrypted contents to an attacker’s server.
First, the attacker would need to intercept or obtain a copy of the PDF in order to insert the pointers, and would need a channel through which to exfiltrate the stolen data without that being noticed, detected or blocked.
Attack #2 – CBC gadgets
Because not all PDF viewers support unencrypted content in PDFs, the researchers tried a more involved technique that exfiltrates plaintext by manipulating the PDF’s cipher block chaining (CBC) encryption format using something called ‘malleability gadgets’.
In this attack, the researchers exploit the lack of integrity protection to modify the encrypted contents directly:
…an attacker can stealthily modify encrypted strings or streams in a PDF file without knowing the corresponding password or decryption key. In most cases, this will not result in meaningful output, but if the attacker, in addition, knows parts of the plaintext, they can easily modify the ciphertext in a way that after the decryption a meaningful plaintext output appears.
Fortunately – from an attacker’s point of view – the PDF AESV3 (AES256) specification defines 12 bytes of known plaintext…
The researchers tested both techniques against 27 popular PDF viewers and editors to see how successful they would be under real-world conditions, finding a surprising amount of variation between programs.
Nevertheless, all 27 were vulnerable to at least one variant on either attack method, including Adobe Acrobat, Foxit Reader, Evince, Okular, Chrome, and Firefox.
What does this mean?
As with other formats that share some of the PDF’s security characteristics (XML, S/MIME, and ePub for instance), there is clearly some work to do in terms of AES-CBC’s integrity protection.
This must be fixed in future PDF specifications and any other format encryption standard, without enabling backward compatibility that would re-enable CBC gadgets.
Thanks to the widespread use of TLS encryption, it would be difficult for attackers to intercept and modify PDFs as they move across a network or the internet, whether the documents themselves are encrypted or not. However, PDFs at rest have been shown to be vulnerable.
If you think it’s worth encrypting your PDFs and you want to be sure they haven’t been tampered with, use a respected third party encryption tool, like GPG.